Alienation of the Singular Parent causation and effect
on being found surplus to requirement
To even suggest there must be
equable law to safeguard the human right of all parents rather as is the case
in 21st century Ireland that one parent’s rights over the other
exist would be heard at first hearing as wholly deserving on the part of the
deemed miscreant former partner; and not simply a jurisprudence proposition in societal
fiscal-acquisition.
Guilty as charged until proven
innocent? Unfortunately the schematic to assuage such a fanciful notion that
the state is against any and/or all notion that the equal right of a parent
regardless of gender and/or marital-status be paramount; as lynch-pin of
constitution in aspiring democratic Republic.
The family court is little more
than a barbaric arena held in camera no witness of defense is allowed nor
indeed required by the professional participants in this archaic ritual of
post-traumatic break-down of all adult relationship and their garnering of
fiscal enhancement; so enjoined in overt deceit?
Paid annually for in millions of
borrowed Eurodollars on the whole I might add derived from state-coffer, by the
state and for the state. A legalized plunder of wealth, status and exorbitant
lifestyle thus afforded further allowed to the minority in society prepared to
support the status-quo; ad-infinitum rather than the majority so-affected.
The alienated Father however does
not ‘stand accused’ as one may witness in the myriad criminal courts that now
abound in modern day Ireland.
Indeed no. That would be too easy to contest and result in the right to a
lawful defense under the constitution; a constitution sworn in life’s blood to
vindicate the life, person, and good name and property rights of every citizen?
BUNREACHT NA hÉIREANN
Articles 40 to 44 of the Irish Constitution provide for 'Fundamental
Rights'.
Article 40 extract - Personal rights
•Equality before the law
•Vindicate the life, person, and good name and property rights of every
citizen
•Liberty
•Express freely convictions and opinions
•Form associations and unions
But unfortunately the following
anomaly only exists for children where their parents are of state-church approved marital status.
3. 1° The State pledges itself to guard with special care the
institution of Marriage, on which the Family is founded, and to protect it
against attack.
2° A Court designated by law may grant a dissolution of marriage where,
but only where, it is satisfied that
i. At the date of the institution of the proceedings, the spouses have
lived apart from one another for a period of, or periods amounting to, at least
four years during the five years,
ii. There is no reasonable prospect of reconciliation between the
spouses,
iii. such provision as the Court considers proper having regard to the
circumstances exists or will be made for the spouses, any children of either or
both of them and any other person prescribed by law, and
iv. Any further conditions prescribed by law are complied with.
Ergo the alienated single-Father
stands alone. Any attempt to address the court is summarily dismissed at best
practice or at worst are accused of offering up the promulgation of political
doctrine; aimed solely to the detriment of attendant judiciary and the imminent
downfall of the state. The Alienated Father not simply perceived as a singular
lone figure bewildered by ceremony of state in their hitherto private life. The
Alienated Father accused without any terms of redress to a contrary state of
affairs often mere hours before their perceived commitment of offence during
relationship breakdown is then fired into the public domain; most often without
notice of forewarning.
The Fundamental Right of Liberty
go’s straight out the window. Despite there being no openly perceived criminality
on the part of the miscreant-partner they are at the very outset of proceedings
warned that to infringe upon the declared outcome of this familial ‘trial’ will
result in pecuniary disadvantage and subsequent state-imprisonment of up to one
year of detention.
This all before any request by the court for ‘social’
reportage albeit by practitioners of Neuro-linguistic programming (NLP) whose
only qualifications I can ascertain are in hypnotism, sports injury further
afforded by a 12 week night-course at Newry College of Further Education in
familial mediation. NLP underlying the 'local' practioners 'qualifications' I may add accredited of one Richard Bandler and a John Grinder NLP created by them in California, USA in the 1970's. The balance of scientific evidence however reveals NLP to be a largely discredited albeit lucrative pseudoscience.
ii. There is no reasonable prospect of reconciliation between the
spouses,
iii. such provision as the Court considers proper having regard to the
circumstances exists or will be made for the spouses, any children of either or
both of them and any other person prescribed by law, and
iv. Any further conditions prescribed by law are complied with.
The above quote serves only to
reinforce the inequality now set before familial-law. To disagree with that
contention is to affirm that the ‘single-Father’ is justifiably denied their
fundamental human right reinforced by societal decree. Denied as an equable parent from
inception of that child’s life, of joint upbringing, of educational, spiritual
and love of that life. To be now found as wholly criminal in intent without
benefit of equable familial-law, lack of redress when proven innocent and
censored with fine and/or state imprisonment. Ego vindicates the life, person, and good name and property rights of every
citizen except that of the unmarried, single ex-partner; outside state-church
preferred marriage-service and/or regardless of societal wish for sanctioned equable parental-relationship.
© The Misery Industry by Séafra Ó
Ceallaigh agus Conor Dignam 2013
BUNREACHT NA hÉIREANN
AN COIMISIÚN UM CHEARTA AN DUINE ~ IRISH HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION
Promoting & Protecting Human Rights in Ireland
http://www.ihrc.ie/yourrights/whatarehumanrights/constitution.html
